Bugs fixes in "bind9"
| Origin | Bug number | Title | Date fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-13204 | If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then B | 2026-09-01 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5950 | An unbounded resend loop vulnerability exists in the BIND 9 resolver state machine during bad-server handling, enabling a remote unauthenticated atta | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5946 | Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or ` | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-3592 | BIND resolvers are vulnerable to an amplified resource consumption/exhaustion attack. If a victim resolver makes a query to a specially crafted zone | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-3039 | BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving an | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5950 | An unbounded resend loop vulnerability exists in the BIND 9 resolver state machine during bad-server handling, enabling a remote unauthenticated atta | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5946 | Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or ` | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-3592 | BIND resolvers are vulnerable to an amplified resource consumption/exhaustion attack. If a victim resolver makes a query to a specially crafted zone | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-3039 | BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving an | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5950 | An unbounded resend loop vulnerability exists in the BIND 9 resolver state machine during bad-server handling, enabling a remote unauthenticated atta | 2026-05-21 |
| CVE | CVE-2026-5946 | Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or ` | 2026-05-21 |
About
-
Send Feedback to @ubuntu_updates
